Editorial Standards

Robot news is full of demos, targets and big numbers. These rules are how we try to tell you what actually happened.

How we choose stories

We look for news that changes what robots can do, what they cost, who builds them and who pays for them: product launches with prices or dates, funding and deals, independent tests, rules and trade decisions, deployments in real workplaces. We do not cover a story just because a video went viral.

How we check

How we label stories

Defense and war

We report military robots as attributed facts: who said it, and whether it can be verified. Figures from one side in a war are always labelled as such. We do not publish operational details that could put people at risk.

People and images

We do not generate images of real robots, real people or real events with AI. Product photos and videos belong to the companies credited. Abstract backgrounds and illustrations made with AI are always labelled "AI illustration".

No advice

Nothing we publish is investment advice or a recommendation to buy a stock or a product. When we compare robots and prices, we tell you what each one does and what it costs, and what we do not know.

Independence

No company pays for coverage. If we ever run advertising or affiliate links, they will be clearly marked and will not change what we report.

Corrections

When we get something wrong, we fix it, say so on the page and list it on our corrections page. You can report an error through our contact page.